A Theory of Negative Energy

 Spacetime only seems to bend, because it doesn’t take into account the whole picture. General Relativity only applies within the light cone. Thus, whatever lies beyond it must at least behave in such a way that any apparent distortions of spacetime are observed within it are superimposed with whatever matter is occupied outside this cone. So, there’s a geometry outside the light cone complementary to our space-time, not a reflection, coexistent with it. Certain timelines may traverse some space-time that from a different frame of reference, could be rendered unnoticeable. But you can have aspects of one thing interact with aspects of another from a some other frame of reference.

2.      Einstein’s Theories of Relativity are mathematical constructions. Thus, they cannot tell the whole truth. Otherwise, that would mean you can reduce every event to a truth-statement in such a theory. And we know that scientists are salty, because they break down at the quantum level, at Planck Scale.

3.      We also know that both quantum mechanics and relativity can be described classically. Meaning, in the case of relativity, that you can model the same predictions with invariant, classical, Euclidean space. And in the case of Quantum Mechanics, you substitute a variety of concepts, like particle and waves, which scientists have arrived at to explain their observations of their well-arranged experiments with, videlicet, a wave function, a mathematical object, equipped with all the ages of theorems about the relations between them, wave functions, whose whole definition rests on an assortment of axiom, whose validity we accept without any proof but common sense, and their operations and notations of choice. But in the one case, you have a theory, again, whose predictions have nothing to do with how, exactly, what’s observed has come to be. In the latter, we do not consider certain other aspects of existence, like gravitational interactions, for reasons such as the negligibility of its influence at such minute scales.

4.      My theory is as follows. That there are ever more elusive objects with which we share space. But on different timelines. That means that at least some constituent of matter interacts with whatever exists beyond the light cone.

5.      A problem is that even Euclidean or Cartesian Geometry cannot tell the whole story, regardless of how many orthogonal bases you account for. Some fractals exist in Rational dimensions!

6.      Thus, I predict that every existent thing must affect any other to some level. Regardless of space and time. And that for this to happen, some effort must be spent towards it in consolidation of their relations. Or rather, some motion of Vital Impetus must occur from one object to the other at every moment of its existence.

7.      To declare an object different from another, we need a means of distinction. A substrate to make a mark on. While Dedekind constructs the Real Numbers with cuts, Conway constructs the Hyperreal Numbers with a similar idea, while still adhering to Riemann’s hypothesis.

8.      And I argue that the only reason energy seems to be quantized, its motions affect other expressions of Vital Impetus, whether we observe them, expressions, or not. In order for a change of state to occur, there must be a catastrophe. And catastrophes are structural. Take the valence electron of an atom for example. When the electron is excited enough to transition to the proper energy level. As the relations between two objects change, so will their influence on their respective surroundings change until they reach a state of stability and economy. These are the states we observe, and we can distinguish between each other, because of the principle of complementarity. But while the transition between one state to another is ongoing, no one can say the electron is in one particular energy level or another. And it all happens so fast, It’s negligible.

9.      What I mean to say is that the greater the mass at a certain frame of reference, the lesser the energy outside its light cone. Or something like that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crítica a la Industrialización en el siglo 21

Last Night in Cairo

Joanne Bergson 2.01